Legislature(1997 - 1998)

01/20/1998 08:16 AM House STA

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
HJR 5 - CONSTIT AMNDMNT: FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE                                 
                                                                               
Number 2025                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES announced the next order of business would be HJR 5,               
"Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Alaska             
relating to freedom of conscience," sponsored by Representative                
Martin.                                                                        
                                                                               
Number 2039                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE TERRY MARTIN said the supreme court has subjugated              
freedom of conscience - only a statutory right versus a                        
constitutional right -- But the U.S. Constitution, and many other              
states, guarantee it.  The court(s) has also put freedom of                    
religion with freedom of conscience.  Historically, freedom of                 
conscience was more superior.  Should freedom of conscience be a               
constitutional right rather than a statutory right.                            
                                                                               
Number 2168                                                                    
                                                                               
PATRICK DALTON testified via teleconference from Delta Junction.               
Mt. Dalton quoted from Revelation, chapter 13 versus 16, 17 and 18,            
stating we are commanded not to receive a mark on the forehead or              
hand.  He believed a national identification number [social                    
security number] is a step in that direction.  Mr. Dalton wondered             
how the freedom of conscience would impact him if it comes to the              
point where he is required to violate his religious beliefs.                   
                                                                               
Number 2261                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES asked Mr. Dalton, since he had not taken his social                
security number, if he had no interest in social security rights or            
benefits.                                                                      
                                                                               
Number 2292                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. DALTON indicated he ran into a lot of discrimination recently              
and didn't believe he would be able to receive his Alaska permanent            
fund any longer.  He was taxed $300, or more out of the permanent              
fund, and believed there is no recourse to get it back from                    
Internal Revenue Service.                                                      
                                                                               
Number 2331                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE MARTIN stated for a couple years he did not get a               
dividend check because he did not believe in the Permanent Fund                
Dividend Program.  But, he receives it now because he contributes              
it to a charity - that was his freedom.  He recognized, in a way,              
Mr. Dalton was expressing his freedom of conscience.                           
Representative Martin noted, however, Mr. Dalton must suffer the               
consequences accordingly.                                                      
                                                                               
Number 2350                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES stated nothing in this life is free, but we do have                
some freedoms and we can choose.                                               
                                                                               
Number 2369                                                                    
                                                                               
KENNETH JACOBUS testified via teleconference from Delta Junction.              
He said he testified on HJR 5 before.  Since he testified, the                 
supreme court decided Mat-Su Coalition for Choice v. Valley                    
Hospital Association, - it is even more clear that things are out              
of balance in the state of Alaska.  He indicated Alaska is now the             
most pro-abortion state in the United States.  The Alaska Supreme              
Court and Valley Hospital stated that the Alaska Constitution                  
protects abortion more broadly than the U.S. Constitution protects             
abortion.  Under the supreme court decision, unwilling participants            
may be forced to perform abortions.  The supreme court also said,              
in Footnote 18, that a person's own religious belief cannot be a               
compelling state interest because that could violate the                       
establishment clause.                                                          
                                                                               
Number 2400                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS said Valley Hospital will have to pay approximately                
$150,000 in attorney's fees, to the other side, plus their own                 
attorney's fees because they relied on state statutes.  The state              
is also going to lose the parental notification and partial birth              
abortion laws in judicial review based on the Alaska Constitution.             
                                                                               
Number 2424                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS indicated the legislature needs to allow the people to             
vote on two issues relating to the Alaska Constitution.  Put                   
freedom of conscience into the constitution so that Alaskans will              
not be forced to violate their conscience.  Most important the                 
subjection of abortion needs to be taken out so that the                       
constitution is made neutral.                                                  
                                                                               
TAPE 98-3, SIDE B                                                              
Number 0001                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE ELTON believed the issue of life support has a                  
different opinion as a matter of conscience.  He asked if this                 
applies much more broadly than pro-life, pro-choice.                           
                                                                               
Number 0015                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS agreed.  He pointed out that he is not necessarily                 
concerned about pro-life, pro-choice.  Mr. Jacobus stressed he is              
concerned about keeping the constitution neutral - and not have it             
support one side or the other.  He said there are gray areas in                
this, but believed a person's right to be protected in their own               
beliefs is so important that the gray areas could be settled later.            
                                                                               
Number 0043                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES stated she had struggled over our constitutional rights            
of freedom of religion - including keeping government and religion             
separated in public schools.  Chair James asked if freedom of                  
conscience is a stronger statement than freedom of religion.                   
                                                                               
Number 0079                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS responded it is a stronger statement of your right to              
protect yourself against being forced to do something that you do              
not want to do.                                                                
                                                                               
Number 0095                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS concluded there are two different concepts, one of                 
which is protected, one of which is not protected right now.                   
                                                                               
Number 0104                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ asked Mr. Jacobus to point out the                    
language indicating that an individual can be compelled to do                  
something against his conscience in the Valley Hospital case.                  
                                                                               
Number 0110                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS stated that was his belief as to what the effect of the            
position is.  He noted there was no specific language in opinion               
that states that - that was the logical exception of the opinion.              
                                                                               
Number 0118                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ asked for clarification - that is not part            
of the opinion.                                                                
                                                                               
Number 0127                                                                    
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS commented that the result of the opinion makes Valley              
Hospital do things which are against the consciences of the members            
of the Board of Valley Hospital.  The opinion does not have broad              
language which says any person may be ordered by the government to             
violate their conscience.                                                      
                                                                               
Number 1146                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ said he is concerned with freedom of                  
conscience.  He asked what impact it would have on the subsistence             
debate.                                                                        
                                                                               
MR. JACOBUS replied that he did not know.                                      
                                                                               
Number 0158                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES indicated HJR 5 would be brought up at the next House              
State Affairs Committee meeting.                                               
                                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects